TM
UNDERSTANDING BALANCED
AND UNBALANCED AUDIO
TECHNOLOGY
MARKET: Security, Professional
Video, Videoconferencing
DOC. NUMBER: T-09
When designing a distribution system for audio,
one of the first determinations that an installer must
make is whether the system needs to support bal-
anced or unbalanced audio. While, in theory, all au-
dio signals may be transmitted in either a balanced
or unbalanced format, in practice, different indus-
tries have opted to use one or the other type of sig-
nal because of the costs and benefits involved. In
general, consumer-level electronics use an unbal-
anced signal, while professional-level equipment
uses balanced audio. As a result, any fiber optic
transmission system connecting such equipment
must be designed or configured to support the ap-
propriate type of signal.
Within the
Fiberlink
line of transmission
systems
there are several products designed
to support
line level audio in both unbalanced and
balanced formats (1 volt rms with 600 Ohms im-
pedance). This TECHnique reviews the basic dif-
ferences between unbalanced and balanced audio,
so that the installer has a better understanding of
each underlying technology.
In short, unbalanced audio is less expensive to support than balanced audio. Among other things, it
requires less expensive connectors and fewer wires. Not surprisingly, the trade-off is a lower sound qual-
ity and limited cable distance. By comparison, balanced audio generates a cleaner signal with less hum
and noise. Due to economics, different industries have adopted either balanced or unbalanced audio as
the standard used by audio equipment designed for use within their respective marketplaces. In general,
consumer-level electronics, such as simple microphones and VCRs for the home, use unbalanced audio.
While the signal from these devices is not as clean as it could be using balanced audio, most consumers
would be unwilling to pay the price for these electronics if balanced audio technology were incorporated
into their designs. Similarly, industrial applications tend to use unbalanced audio signals, as in these envi-
ronments, the requirements for sound quality are quite low. Basic functionality is usually sufficient. Con-
versely, professional level equipment, such audio mixers, amplifiers and broadcast equipment use bal-
anced audio. In these applications, the users of the equipment are far more concerned with ultimate sound
quality than with budgetary restrictions.
The accompanying diagram shows the details of both types of interfaces. In an unbalanced system, the
input is referenced to ground. The system is designed to interface with common, single-conductor, shielded
Fiberlink